tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8228844.post7205974650083859280..comments2024-03-26T09:54:09.992+05:30Comments on Sumer's Radiology Blog: Is CT head relevant in current scenario?Sumer Sethihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10096119373804793447noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8228844.post-51760735578186574302010-07-22T19:26:21.503+05:302010-07-22T19:26:21.503+05:30I do differ.
We r aware of the clinical history.We...I do differ.<br />We r aware of the clinical history.We can fit CT in to radiological decission making algorithm and while intrpreting we understand limitations and advantages of the modality,what ever ,in question.dr sb nayaknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8228844.post-28407477287250140502010-07-08T20:54:15.416+05:302010-07-08T20:54:15.416+05:30It is fine foir developed economy with institution...It is fine foir developed economy with institutionalised practice <br />but for the rest of the world which is 6 billion plus , CT in the near time irreplaceble for the head and is infact proving more useful in far reaching areas with headinjuries. remote access reporting by competent people is only making better<br />i perosnally agree with your views . but hte world has to wait for a while to be able to afford <br /> drmgkmurthydrmgkmurthynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8228844.post-18507491389390965252010-06-26T08:22:29.042+05:302010-06-26T08:22:29.042+05:30Ya Sir,
I also think that plain CT might not be us...Ya Sir,<br />I also think that plain CT might not be useful but for emergencies its the best as its very fast.<br />Also as far as india is concerned....cost is a big factor here....not every1 can afford an mri....so ct will still hold its place for quite some time....<br /><br />PankajPankaj Nagorihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07203055149067703240noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8228844.post-79921763351276407472010-06-26T02:06:30.570+05:302010-06-26T02:06:30.570+05:30What I have learned in neurology..
CT is faster, ...What I have learned in neurology..<br /><br />CT is faster, Cheaper and more sensitive in differentiating Hemorrhagic from ischemic strokes and is still the first choice.<br /><br />Faster "thrombolytic therapy"<br />Cheaper "I live in Egypt"<br />More sensitive "hgc and ischemic strokes have dramatically different management as you know..<br /><br /><br />I want to read your openionMohammad Aboul-wafahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09986508872452784900noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8228844.post-14480321066853032582010-06-25T23:11:16.497+05:302010-06-25T23:11:16.497+05:30Definitely still useful in acute stroke for ruling...Definitely still useful in acute stroke for ruling out bleeding before initiating thrombolysis.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com